The article that I wrote I tried posting to DACON on his site and asked for sources to back up his claims, but my comments have not been approved.
So anyway I shall use this article to ask questions. Here we go.
"AGAIN OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND AGAIN
THE XTIANS IN THE CHAT ROOMS DONT LIKE THE TRUTH. THEY ARE MORE HAPPY IN LIES AND STUPIDITY.
I SUPPOSE THEY WROTE THE MANTRA THAT ‘IGNORANCE IS BLISS’
The xtians cant bare to hear the truth of the falacy of their xtian belief system
The majority,if not all pray to the king james version bible."
What Christians are you referring to that pray to the King James Bible? No Christian prays to the Bible if he is biblically solid. To pray to the Bible would be idolatrous to engage in.
"This guy jimmy(king james) was an admitted homosexual. He admitted to having 4 male lovers
in addittion to his wife and a concubine or two. Research it. I dont speak unless
I have checked various sources, which I have."
Then perhaps you can give the source. If you make a claim, can you show it? If you are going to make a claim, you need to prove it.
People should be wary if one doesn't give a source. Can you give the sources to what you are saying so I and others can read it?
"This jimmy fella hired 600 poets breaking them off into groups of 6 – 8 people to write a ‘bible’
in the poetic style of the JEWISH TORAH..
After a period of time he selected the group he liked best calling it the ‘king james version’.
HEY YOU PEOPLE READING THIS…. DO YOU KNOW WHAT HE DID WITH THE WRITERS
INCLUDING THE GROUP HE CHOSE????? HE KILLED THEM ALL.
THIS IS THE XTIAN BIBLE….A GAY WACKO. KING JIMMY.
someone asked me what does that have to do with anything….
ARE YOU XTIANS SO DENSE THAT YOU CANT FIGURE IT OUT YOURSELF.
YOU CALL JIMMY A DIVINE INSPIRATION..
HOW DIVINE IS THAT PRAYING TO THE HEAVENS, TO your god
WRITTEN BY WHAT THE HEAVENS REJECT AND CALL AN ABOMINATION …HOMOSEXUALITY
IS homsexuality DIVINE, HEY xtians,ANSWER ME?????"
Homosexuality is abomination biblically speaking but even if King James were gay, how does this affect the KJV?
The subject of homosexuality is addressed here: http://answering-judaism.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/does-bible-condemn-homosexuality.html
Plus, only a die hard KJV onlyist, (not all) will regard the KJV as inspired. Even the KJV translators don't believe their text to be an inspired text.
I would recommend watching James White's video series on the KJV for more information.
"COME BACK IN A FEW DAYS, I ‘LL ADD TO THIS MORE, MUCH MORE ….
I END WITH……
YOU XTIANS ARE AFRAID OF ME..A TORAH JEW
ME, I WHO KNOWS YOUR FRAUDULENT ORIGINS
IT IS ME, YES ME AND THATS WHY YOU BLOCK ME OUT BECAUSE I MAKE YOU REALIZE..
YOU ARE FOLLOWING A MEANINGLESS REDICULOUS MAN MADE FAITH..
I, WHO KNOWSWHO EXPOSES YOUR MAMZER JEUSX BACKGROUND
DONT FEAR YOU XTIANS., ITS ALL A FABRICATION,,,JESUX CANT DO A THING TO YOU FOR CURSING HIM…
BECAUSE HE IS DEAD !!!(MAMZER means joseph wasn’t his father..the roman ‘pantera’ was)
WHO KNOWS YOUR WITNESSES THAT NEVER WERE THERE
BECAUSE THE ROMANS FORBID JEWS TO ASSEMBLE IN LARGE CROWDS OF OVER 5 JEWS."
Again, Even in your dialogue with me and other chats, while you did quote from your Rabbis, when you made an assertion about Christianity, you didn't provide a source for me to look into it.
To be honest you don't really expose anything. Joseph was Jesus' father by adoption, he was not the son of a "roman pantera".
Here is my article with respect to points you made in our public dialogue:
Don't take offence when someone addresses your claims, which I tried to in our public exchange.
One point I will repeat from the articles is this, The following verses need no explanation:
"Matthew 27:55 Many women were there, watching from a distance. They
had followed Jesus from Galilee to care for his needs. 56 Among them
were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph,[f] and the
mother of Zebedee’s sons."
"Mark 15:40 Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were
Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joseph,[d]
and Salome. 41 In Galilee these women had followed him and cared for his
needs. Many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem were also
"Luke 23:48 When all the people who had gathered to witness this
sight saw what took place, they beat their breasts and went away. 49 But
all those who knew him, including the women who had followed him from
Galilee, stood at a distance, watching these things."
All three Gospels record witnesses being at the cross together but place different emphasises on certain details.
You DO have eyewitnesses TO Jesus and the NT is part of historical study. To dismiss it is irresponsible.
I on the other hand have provided evidence regarding echad from Tovia Singer, have QUOTED him and LINKED to one of his articles, which DO address the Christian usage of Echad. HE IS REFUTING A CHRISTIAN OBJECTION!!! Also his video teaching on the Trinity is also a rebuttal to Christians which to be honest it's a weak one but that's besides the point. The point is I provided evidence for what I have said whereas YOU DACON, haven't.
PS. Update 15th of November 2014. There is a comment on the article in question from me, but no response as of yet,